Baptism Yet Again

by Phil Gons on August 21st, 2007

baptism-yet-again.jpgWhat started out as an interchange between Wayne Grudem and John Piper developed into a discussion involving 9Marks’s Mark Dever and Aaron Menikoff. The dialog—no longer really a back-and-forth debate—continues.

Abraham Piper raises the question of whether Baptists should consider paedobaptists as unrepentant sinners, which seems to be the necessary conclusion if, from the Baptist’s perspective, non-first-generation paedobaptists are failing to obey the Scriptural teaching to be baptized after conversion. It would seem logically that, if they are sinning unrepentantly, they are destined for hell.

Mark Dever responds that we need to nuance discussions of sin. The paedobaptist’s sin—if he is wrong—is a sin of ignorance, which God views and treats differently than known sin.

Here are some of the most recent contributions:

Here is the complete list of relevant posts and material:

See our previous posts:

See also Justin Taylor’s overview post: Baptizoblogodebate Roundup (with Breaking News).

You may also be interested in this recent debate on the proper subjects of baptism:

Like this post? Subscribe to our feed .


1 Response to “Baptism Yet Again”

  1. flameofyahweh

    from the Abraham Piper response:

    “What does this mean for those who are wrong about baptism?

    It means just that—they’re wrong. But being wrong and being an unrepentant sinner are not the same. If they were, everybody with an imperfect theology (all of us) would be lost. ”

    Does the writer make room for Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses who are sincerely wrong in their theology because of misguidance?

    A Mormon and JW will repent just like you and I withouth fully understanding grace due to blindness. What then?

    A sincere question.

Leave a Response

 
-->